Reform UK’s deputy leader has come under fire for disseminating what critics call misinformation about children with special educational needs and disabilities during a recent press briefing.

Richard Tice asserted today that there is an “over-diagnosis” of children with SEND and criticized the sight of children wearing ear defenders in classrooms as “insane”. This sparked outrage among experts who denounced Reform’s lack of understanding of the education system.

The MP for Boston and Skegness also insinuated that some parents were exploiting the SEND system for financial gain, suggesting that affluent families were manipulating the system to save on private school fees. He further criticized families who qualified for a motability vehicle but opted to use taxis for school transport instead.

During a speech in Westminster, Mr. Tice argued against labeling children and downplayed the significance of formal diagnoses, claiming that children without labels are starting to feel marginalized. He decried the use of ear defenders in classrooms, describing it as nonsensical and calling for an end to the practice.

Ear defenders are essential for some children with autism or sensory issues who are sensitive to noise. Henry Shelford, CEO of ADHD UK, highlighted the importance of accommodating these children’s sensory needs.

Mr. Tice also raised concerns about young people being medicated for various conditions, suggesting a potential conflict of interest between pharmaceutical companies, psychologists, and the need for medication.

Daniel Kebede, General Secretary of the National Education System, criticized Reform’s lack of comprehension of the education system and the needs of SEND students, emphasizing the importance of reasonable adjustments in schools.

Kate Lawson, from the national disability charity Sense, condemned comments dismissing the challenges faced by disabled children and stressed the urgent need for adequate support in the SEND system.

Joey Nettleton Burrows, from the National Autistic Society, refuted claims of parents profiting from SEND needs and emphasized the necessity for system reforms to cater to all children, including those with special needs.

The ongoing debate underscores the complexities and challenges within the education system, particularly regarding the inclusion and support of children with special educational needs and disabilities.