Government authorities are considering reducing road widths to deter drivers from overtaking cyclists. This move aims to enhance cyclist safety by making it clearer to motorists that overtaking is not permitted. While the intention is to improve cyclist safety, some critics argue that this could exacerbate traffic congestion and tensions between drivers and cyclists. This proposal follows a recent modification to the Highway Code in 2022, recommending specific distances for safe overtaking.
The latest guidance, as per a report by Active Travel England (ATE), suggests that lanes should be narrowed to 3.25 meters or less. ATE suggests that narrower lanes would encourage cyclists to ride more centrally, reducing the risk of accidents. ATE’s research indicates that lanes between 3.25 meters and 3.90 meters wide pose the highest crash risk. The recommendation includes widening one lane and narrowing another in cases where there are two opposing lanes of 3.65 meters.
Critics of the proposal argue that constraints in urban areas may lead to more frequent reductions in road widths. The narrower lanes are expected to convey to motorists that there is insufficient space for safe overtaking while signaling to cyclists the need to ride more centrally. Brian Gregory, policy director at the Alliance of British Drivers, criticized the plan, highlighting potential economic costs and emphasizing the importance of cooperation between road users for safety.
Research by Churchill Motor Insurance revealed that the width of several popular car models has increased over the years, while parking spaces have largely remained the same. For instance, the Ford Fiesta’s width has expanded from 155cm to 174cm since its launch. The Department of Transport clarified that there are no legally binding standards for road widths. The ATE guidance, although not legally binding, is considered best practice, with councils expected to adhere to it.
The Department of Transport reaffirmed its commitment to supporting drivers and improving road infrastructure. While the ATE guidance is not mandatory, it is viewed as a beneficial reference point for councils. Share your opinions on the new guidance in the poll below.