A member of a prominent pro-separation organization, the Alberta Prosperity Project, has stepped down after using a racial slur at an event where the group unveiled a preliminary constitution for an independent Alberta. The gathering, hosted by the group responsible for the “Stay Free Alberta” citizen initiative petition, featured members of the Black Hat Gang from Medicine Hat who played a role in developing the plan and presented the proposed document. Ian Parkinson, one of the members, was introduced as a co-author of the draft constitution named the “Foundation of Freedom,” which was showcased in Airdrie and streamed online.
During the event, Parkinson made a derogatory comment that drew applause from the audience, but was later condemned. Following this incident, Mitch Sylvestre, the leader of the Alberta Prosperity Project, announced Parkinson’s immediate resignation from the group, emphasizing that his remarks were not endorsed by the organization. Parkinson, who is associated with the Black Hat Gang, was confirmed not to hold any official position within the Alberta Prosperity Project.
Criticism of Parkinson’s comment extended to various quarters, including individuals within the separatist movement who expressed disapproval, stating that such remarks tarnish the reputation of their cause. Keith Wilson, co-leader of the pro-independence group Let Alberta Decide, denounced Parkinson’s statement, highlighting the need to distance themselves from inappropriate remarks that do not align with the values of their supporters.
The draft constitution presented by the Alberta Prosperity Project, known as the “Foundation of Freedom,” faced backlash from factions within the separatist movement. This document proposed unique elements such as establishing an “oversight branch” as a fourth arm of government, abolishing property taxes, implementing term limits for elected officials, and electing judges rather than appointing them in a sovereign Alberta. Notably, the document was not shared with the public online or with news outlets before this report.
Despite the presentation of the draft constitution, lack of consensus among separatists was evident, with some leaders distancing themselves from the proposed document. While the event was positioned as a culmination of collaborative efforts involving various parties, disagreements emerged regarding the content and readiness of the constitution for an independent Alberta.
Looking ahead, Sylvestre emphasized that the draft constitution serves as a starting point for broader discussions on a future Alberta constitution, with the possibility of a constitutional conference if a binding referendum on separation gains approval. Despite differing opinions within the separatist camp, Sylvestre acknowledged the autonomy of other independence groups to either support or reject the presented draft, underscoring the ongoing democratic process of exchanging ideas within the movement.
As the Alberta independence movement continues to navigate internal divisions, questions linger regarding the unified plan for separation as the provincial election approaches on October 19.